Classification: Prologue: Epilogue: On the attached note: OSP coatings are fragile, and require careful handling. Fingerprints will sometimes affect solderability, with mild fluxes. More likely though, the preheat in the assembly process could be too high, causing oxidation of the Cu surface just prior to assembly reflow. Quality of the preclean prior to the application of the 106A is also critical. Also possible, is mechanical damage to the Cu surface prior to paste apply; this mechanical damage to the pads could also expose virgin Cu to the atmosphere. If you don't need two or three pass solder processing, standard Entek rather than the Entek + may be better. If the problem is repetitive, analyze the pads prior to paste apply with IR Spectra or other surface analysis techniques to look for organics and oxides . After reflow, you still may be able to detect organics if they are thick and have not burned away on areas that did not solder. Also, you may want to investigate solder paste stencil height, which will affect solder volume, and the wetting angle at the base of the solder joint. A highly solderable component lead will attract the solder so that full wetting of the pad may not occur if solder volume is low and pad is overly large. Wetting angle will help tell you if you have a solderability problem. Jim Herard [log in to unmask] ---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Herard/Endicott/IBM on 03-11-97 11:22 AM --------------------------- TechNet-request @ ipc.ipc.org 03-11-97 11:05 AM To: TechNet @ ipc.org@internet cc: Subject: Unidentified subject! We recently tried an OSP (Entek Plus CU106A) on one of our new designs. The board contains fine pitch surface mount and thru-hole. Both our PCB manufacturer and assembly house have dealt with OSP's in the past. When we received the assembled boards back from our assembly house we noticed that the solder did not fully cover various pads. The assembly house said that they opened up the aperture on the stencil to allow sufficient solder paste to be deposited to cover the entire pad. The solder joints look excellent. Our assembly house says that there must have been contaminants in the processing of the OSP coating at the PCB manufacturing house. As of yet I have not received a response from our PCB board house. Has anyone heard of this situation? If the PCB vendor comes back and says the problem is not on their end who should I believe? Thank you in advance. Mike Forrester LeCroy Corp. [log in to unmask] *************************************************************************** * TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * *************************************************************************** * To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message [log in to unmask]> * * with and no text in the body. * *************************************************************************** * If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact * * Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] * *************************************************************************** *************************************************************************** * TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * *************************************************************************** * To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message [log in to unmask]> * * with and no text in the body. * *************************************************************************** * If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact * * Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] * ***************************************************************************